Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 27.06.2025 20:03

Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
The "F1" Reviews Are In - Dark Horizons
Let’s just make it real clear:
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Brad Pitt Wears a Cobalt Blue Velvet Blazer and Barrel Jeans with Ines de Ramon - instyle.com
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
Thank you.
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Scientists Uncover Giant Spiders That Once Terrorized Jurassic Earth - The Daily Galaxy
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
Russia can stop this any time.
What’s next?
Why doesn’t the UK change their flag?
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Will norovirus surge early again this year? CDC urges tracking of new strain. - CBS News
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
Just in the last 5 years:
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.